Re: [closed] Re: Handling of 'non-XProc' pipeline sources

Toman_Vojtech@emc.com writes:

>> >> What should happen if I pass this document to an XProc 
>> processor as the
>> >> pipeline source:
>> >
>> > Per the 5 Feb 2009 minutes, I've added err:XS0059.
>
> There is an overlap between err:XS0052 and err:XS0059 now.
>
> err:XS0052:
> "It is a static error if the URI of a p:import cannot be retrieved or
> if, once retrieved, it does not point to a p:library, p:declare-step, or
> p:pipeline."
>
> err:XS0059:
> "It is a static error if the pipeline element is not p:pipeline,
> p:declare-step, or p:library."
>
> Is this OK, or do we want to remove that "p:library, p:declare-step,
> p:pipeline" bit from err:XS0052 and make p:import refer to both
> err:XS0052 and err:XS0059?

I'm inclined to leave XS0052 alone as the "p:import failed error", but
I don't feel strongly about it.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Things work out best for those who make
http://nwalsh.com/            | the best of the way things work out.