- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:04:52 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> writes: >> whats the impact of considering importing more then one anonymous >> pipeline a static error ? > > It's not an error at all. They don't have to have names, they have to > have types. It just happens to be that they *can* have names. > yes, I was thinking anonymous pipeline was secret codeword for a step with no name and no type ;) > In fact, you can't refer to them by name, so maybe all we need to do > is finesse the scoping rules a little bit. > this is how its most likely actually handled at the app layer ... so I think this is the right place to adjust. J > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | One stops being a child when one > http://nwalsh.com/ | realizes that telling one's trouble > | does not make it better.--Cesare Pavese >
Received on Friday, 28 November 2008 20:05:27 UTC