- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:48:02 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m263wzbar1.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say: | Consider the following step: | | <p:for-each> | <p:iteration-source> | <p:inline><doc1/></p:inline> | <p:inline><doc2/></p:inline> | <p:inline><doc3/></p:inline> | </p:iteration-source> | <p:output port="identity"> | <p:output port="hello"> | <p:inline> | <p>Hello World</p> | </p:inline> | </p:output> | <p:identity/> | </p:for-each> | | I assume that the output on the 'identity' port is (doc1,doc2,doc3) and | the output on the 'hello' port is three documents, each consisting of | "<p>Hello World</p>" | | Right so far? | | Now consider this step: | | <p:for-each> | <p:iteration-source> | <p:empty/> | </p:iteration-source> | <p:output port="identity"> | <p:output port="hello"> | <p:inline> | <p>Hello World</p> | </p:inline> | </p:output> | <p:identity/> | </p:for-each> | | What does it produce? I assume an empty sequence on both output ports, right? Yes. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as http://nwalsh.com/ | possible, but no simpler.
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 17:48:14 UTC