- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:01:05 +0000
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
2008/12/15 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>: > "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: >> "p:output, with a p:document child does not specify where the output >> of a step is to be serialized." > > In 5.4, it says: > > If a binding is provided for a p:output, documents are read from > that binding and those documents form the output that is written to > the output port. In other words, placing a p:document inside a > p:output causes the processor to read that document and provide it > on the output port. It does not cause the processor to write the > output to that document. > > Do you want something in addition to that, or do you think that text > isn't in the most useful place, or...something else? As I've heard, it's the asymmetrical nature of p:input/p:document (for input) vs p:output/p:document ..... for a ?? replacement output?? that makes it hard. How about a <d:important> somewhere there, pointing out the lack of symmetry and how p:store does for output what p:document does for input? HTH -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Monday, 15 December 2008 11:01:40 UTC