Re: clarify xpath relation to XProc

/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| ok, which is of course reasonable thinking,
|
| I am interested in the 'incompatibility' points with current XProc if
| Xpath 2.0 was used. It might be a 'bridge to far' thinking about
| optional XPath 2.0 support in v1 Xproc....

It would be a significant impediment to interoperability. I don't
think we're going to go there.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.