- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:30:54 +0200
- To: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
ok, which is of course reasonable thinking, I am interested in the 'incompatibility' points with current XProc if Xpath 2.0 was used. It might be a 'bridge to far' thinking about optional XPath 2.0 support in v1 Xproc.... cheers, Jim Fuller On 6/11/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > James Fuller wrote: > > What is the position of the wg on the impact of XPATH 2 support, I am > > assuming that XPATH 1 was a deliberate decision to go with. > > I think the general feeling was that requiring XPath 2.0 would be too > great an implementation burden for v1 of XProc, mostly because there > aren't many off-the-shelf XPath 2.0 implementations around at the moment. > > Cheers, > > Jeni > -- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com >
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 14:30:57 UTC