[closed] Re: Implementation report on xml:id

/ Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> was heard to say:
| On Friday, June 24, 2005, 9:16:29 PM, Norman wrote:
|
| NW> / Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> was heard to say:
| NW> | I do not consider this an adequate implementation report.  Please state
| NW> | which tests were passed by each implementation, and please state what
| NW> | the pass or fail criteria are for each test.
|
| NW> Hi Chris,
|
| NW> The implementation report has been updated:
|
| NW>   http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id-implementation.html
|
| NW> Please take a look and let us know if you are still unsatisfied with
| NW> it.
|
| The implementation report is now very clear and informative regarding
| which tests are passed or failed by a given implementation. This deals
| very well with my first point.

Thanks.

| Turning to the second point, its not entirely clear what the pass or
| failure criteria are for each test
|
| http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/
|
| says what is tested but not what must be done to pass... ah, is
|
| http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/test-suite.xml
|
| the documentation? Yes, I see <result> and <notes> elements which seem
| to document this. Its not super clear (when one is already on a page
| called "The xml:id test suite", following a link with the anchor text
| "test suite" is not an obvious thing to do to find out how to judge
| whether a test is passed or not) but it is documented. Therefore my
| second point has been dealt with.
|
| In http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/ is it possible to generate it
| such that the notes field is also included?

Done.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Received on Friday, 24 June 2005 20:19:51 UTC