- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 08:48:39 -0500
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org, Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Message-ID: <87pszhycso.fsf_-_@nwalsh.com>
Thank you, Karl! / Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> was heard to say: | Norman, | | We are discussing about this issue in the QA WG these days. | See | Minutes of QA Teleconf | http://www.w3.org/mid/d6ad0b555048ebc96b07a60f8ff48eb0@ontologicon.com | David Marston analysis for xml:id | http://www.w3.org/mid/OFCA7F3AF3.94B1ABCB-ON85256F9B.0077B50E@lotus.com | | Le 27 janv. 2005, à 15:06, Norman Walsh a écrit : |> The CR draft clearly identifies that it is the 'xml:id processor' that |> implements this specification. It goes on to say: |> |> "This specification defines xml:id processing, but it is up to the |> application to determine when such processing occurs. Users of |> applications that provide facilities for modifying XML documents may |> reasonably expect xml:id processing to occur whenever a change is made |> to an ID value." |> |> I believe that that satisfies the issue you identified above. | | Yes it is. :) Thanks. | |> I believe the conformance section now clearly identifies which |> requirements are manditory and which are not: |> |> "Conformance to constraints that \u201cmust\u201d be assured is |> mandatory. It is recommended that applications assure the other |> constraints as well. This specification defines no simply optional |> constraints." | | Yes satisfied. | |>> 4.3.A [6] is not met |>> |>> I encourage you first to read this message from Dave Marston, IBM [7] |>> |>> Suggestion |>> ================================= |>> xxx. Extensibility of xml:id |>> |>> [Write prose here if you expect people to extend the behaviors already |>> defined in the specification, if not say so. xml:id is not extensible |>> and as to be implemented as it is.] |>> ================================= |> |> This is now addressed by Section 8 of the CR draft. |> |> I believe that we have addressed all of the issues raised in this |> message, |> please let me know if you agree. | | Indeed Congratulations. | | As a double congratulations I would like to say that I think you are | one of the first specification to be conformant to Spec GL. :))) | So I think I'm more than satisfied. | | -- | Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ | W3C Conformance Manager | *** Be Strict To Be Cool *** Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 13:49:33 UTC