- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:13:57 -0500
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org, Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Message-Id: <6a893ce97633b77f6695a7d7bee76346@w3.org>
Norman, We are discussing about this issue in the QA WG these days. See Minutes of QA Teleconf http://www.w3.org/mid/d6ad0b555048ebc96b07a60f8ff48eb0@ontologicon.com David Marston analysis for xml:id http://www.w3.org/mid/OFCA7F3AF3.94B1ABCB-ON85256F9B.0077B50E@lotus.com Le 27 janv. 2005, à 15:06, Norman Walsh a écrit : > The CR draft clearly identifies that it is the 'xml:id processor' that > implements this specification. It goes on to say: > > "This specification defines xml:id processing, but it is up to the > application to determine when such processing occurs. Users of > applications that provide facilities for modifying XML documents may > reasonably expect xml:id processing to occur whenever a change is made > to an ID value." > > I believe that that satisfies the issue you identified above. Yes it is. :) Thanks. > I believe the conformance section now clearly identifies which > requirements are manditory and which are not: > > "Conformance to constraints that \u201cmust\u201d be assured is > mandatory. It is recommended that applications assure the other > constraints as well. This specification defines no simply optional > constraints." Yes satisfied. >> 4.3.A [6] is not met >> >> I encourage you first to read this message from Dave Marston, IBM [7] >> >> Suggestion >> ================================= >> xxx. Extensibility of xml:id >> >> [Write prose here if you expect people to extend the behaviors already >> defined in the specification, if not say so. xml:id is not extensible >> and as to be implemented as it is.] >> ================================= > > This is now addressed by Section 8 of the CR draft. > > I believe that we have addressed all of the issues raised in this > message, > please let me know if you agree. Indeed Congratulations. As a double congratulations I would like to say that I think you are one of the first specification to be conformant to Spec GL. :))) So I think I'm more than satisfied. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2005 04:55:15 UTC