Fair enough I was just trying to make the point that we should be careful when we say "WELL FORMED" and thinking "NAMESPACE WELL FORMED" For example, what should the output of XML-ER be for the following input : <foo::></foo::> (which is obviously WELL FORMED but not NAMESPACE WELL FORMED) Mohamed On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:47 PM, George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com>wrote: > Thanks Mohamed for catching that. Anyway, the idea remains, if you have > > <x0> > ... > </x0> > > and you want to get to > > <y0> > ... > </y0> > > you may pass through a not well-formed state when you delete x and before > entering y: > > <0> > ... > </0> > > > Best Regards, > George > -- > George Cristian Bina > <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger > http://www.oxygenxml.com > > On 3/5/12 6:30 PM, Innovimax W3C wrote: > >> George >> >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:37 AM, George Cristian Bina >> <george@oxygenxml.com <mailto:george@oxygenxml.com>> wrote: >> >> (not well-formed) >> <:element xmlns:x="..."> >> other content >> </:element> >> >> >> W.r.t to XML 1.0 spec, this is XML Well formed[1] >> >> But that's true that it's not Namespace Well Formed [2] >> >> Mohamed >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#NT-**NameStartChar<http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#NT-NameStartChar> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-**names/#Conformance<http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/#Conformance> >> >> -- >> Innovimax SARL >> Consulting, Training & XML Development >> 9, impasse des Orteaux >> 75020 Paris >> Tel : +33 9 52 475787 >> Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 >> http://www.innovimax.fr >> RCS Paris 488.018.631 >> SARL au capital de 10.000 € >> > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 17:18:49 UTC