- From: George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:47:41 +0200
- To: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- CC: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "public-xml-er@w3.org Community Group" <public-xml-er@w3.org>
Thanks Mohamed for catching that. Anyway, the idea remains, if you have <x0> ... </x0> and you want to get to <y0> ... </y0> you may pass through a not well-formed state when you delete x and before entering y: <0> ... </0> Best Regards, George -- George Cristian Bina <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com On 3/5/12 6:30 PM, Innovimax W3C wrote: > George > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:37 AM, George Cristian Bina > <george@oxygenxml.com <mailto:george@oxygenxml.com>> wrote: > > (not well-formed) > <:element xmlns:x="..."> > other content > </:element> > > > W.r.t to XML 1.0 spec, this is XML Well formed[1] > > But that's true that it's not Namespace Well Formed [2] > > Mohamed > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#NT-NameStartChar > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/#Conformance > > -- > Innovimax SARL > Consulting, Training & XML Development > 9, impasse des Orteaux > 75020 Paris > Tel : +33 9 52 475787 > Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 > http://www.innovimax.fr > RCS Paris 488.018.631 > SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 16:48:12 UTC