- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:02:34 -0500
- To: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
- CC: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "public-xml-er@w3.org" <public-xml-er@w3.org>
On 2/27/2012 7:19 PM, David Lee wrote: > I agree with David. One style of spec is better than two. As they say > about the man with 2 watches ... > > I don't mind a functional style spec at all as long as its indicated > that this is just an abstract way of describing behaviour. I don't think we're at the point of having to decide whether either one of them or both simultaneously would emerge as normative. What we do have is people disagreeing about which would be the more effective style of specification, and at least some people saying they have trouble imagining the details an option that others seem inclined to investigate. Given all that, it seems to me it can only be a good thing if Jeni, perhaps with help from others like me, is willing to put some effort into seeing what a declarative or functional specification might look like, in parallel with the ongoing work by Anne. That will give all of us better insights into the tradeoffs, and inform any choices we decide to make later. Obviously, there will be some limits as to how much work people want to put into polishing details of a draft that conceivably would be rejected entirely, but at this point that's a risk even if we pursue only one option. Noah
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 01:03:01 UTC