On 26.11.2014 21:58, Norman Walsh wrote: >> The second bullet in 4.3 needs to say that if the xila attribute is >> assigned the null string, any specification of that attribute on a top >> level included element is deleted > > Do we? We had that rule for xml:id because an empty string is not a > valid value for xml:id. That's not the case for attributes generally. > > I could be persuaded otherwise, but my initial thought is > > xila:foo="" > > puts > > foo="" > > on the top-level elements. Indeed, it makes sense to be consistent with copied namespaced attributes here, where bar:foo="" produces bar:foo="" on top-level elements. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML and Web consulting and training services DocBook/DITA customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 21:12:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:40:51 UTC