- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:35:44 -0600
- To: ietf@ietf.org
- CC: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
On 2014-03-03 04:04, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has received a request from the Applications Area Working Group > WG (appsawg) to consider the following document: > - 'XML Media Types' > <draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-09.txt> as Proposed Standard > > . . . Dear IETF, The W3C XML Core Working Group has continued to follow the progress of XML Media Types (aka 3023-bis) over that last year (and more). We have reviewed almost all of the http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-0*.txt drafts and would like to support its transition to Proposed Standard. Our Working Group members have made several comments on earlier drafts as well as reviewed the comments and dispositions of others as evidenced by http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/3023bis/02-comments.html and http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/3023bis/06-comments.html and various emails archived in our groups mailing list at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Sep/0010 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Sep/0019 and various other threads. We look forward to having an updated replacement to RFC 3023. Paul Grosso, co-chair for the W3C XML Core Working Group
Received on Monday, 3 March 2014 19:36:15 UTC