- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 08:20:02 -0500
- To: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <53551B02.5090702@paulgrosso.name>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be April 30. Henry, David, Paul give regrets. Norm will chair. Status and open actions ======================= XML Potential Errata -------------------- Comment that "or by the Byte Order Mark" is lacking in section 4.3.3: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2013OctDec/0002 Comment that an entity cannot "begin" with a BOM as suggested in section 4.3.3: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2013OctDec/0003 ACTION to John and Henry: Review and comment on the above two comments on the discussion of BOMs in section 4.3.3 of the XML spec. --- Comment about documents with an "empty DTD": http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Jan/thread#msg8 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/ Henry suggests we could probably make the XML spec clearer here; see also his comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/0004 Paul sent the WG response at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/0005 and there was more back from the commentor at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/ ACTION to Henry: Read the post-February 6 email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/ and let us know what you think we should do. Submitting XML Schema 1.1 to ISO -------------------------------- See also https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-schema We have decided we will first publish XML Schema 1.1 2E (with approved errata). After that, we would send XML Schema 1.1 2E (only) to ISO. Loren has offered to do the editorial duties, and David talked to CMSMCQ about getting some more help in the details. ACTION to Loren and David: Produce a publication-ready version of XML Schema 1.1 2E incorporating the approved errata. It looks like there are 3 bugs for Structures, none for Datatypes, but after checking with Michael, he found https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html which shows 8 errata items whereas bugzilla shows only 3. We discussed https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html Henry figures we can just publish this document. Loren still needs to check with Michael that things are appropriately checked in and, if so, we should just push this document through the tool chain and publish. Paul and Loren have pinged Michael, and he says he will try to find time soon to reply. ACTION to Loren and Paul: Communicate with Michael as necessary and produce an XML Schema 1.1 2E document. XML Media types (3023bis) ------------------------- There is now a February 23 draft at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-08 with a diff at http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/3023bis/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-08_diff and a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/3023bis/07-comments.html ...and finally a March 2 draft at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-09 (I could find no DoC or non-auto diff). [Henry, the first sentence of the last paragraph of section 2.2 includes the phrase "are given names in in [UNICODE]"--note the extra "in".] Paul has sent another WG email of support at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Mar/0003 and http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg11550.html Henry reports that the IESG has tentatively approved the spec. There we many comments made, though none requiring substantive changes. Henry is creating the final draft of the final version. And Wendy Seltzer has acknowledged that the W3C is now the official change controller for all the XML related media type registrations. Henry reports that we are in the real end game. Review is over, and it is in the RFC editor queue. We will get an RFC number soon-ish. XInclude 1.1 ------------ On 2012 February 14, we published XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/ On 9 October 2012, we published our FPWD of XInclude 1.1 at http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/WD-xinclude-11-20121009/ On 15 January 2013, we published our (first) Last Call of XInclude 1.1 at http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-xinclude-11-20130115/ and Paul sent the transition announcement at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Jan/0012 (also cc-ing the chairs mailing list). On 2013 October 8, we published the XInclude 1.1 CR at http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-xinclude-11-20131008/ Norm reports that Michael Kay's code just accesses Xerces code, so Norm might have to work with Xerces. DV reports that he is busy and so cannot commit to a deadline for adding XInclude 1.1 support to libxml. ACTION to Norm: Continue to work toward getting XInclude 1.1 implementations and document them in our implementation report. Note also the desire for another test case for the XInclude test suite per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Apr/0000 Norm may see if he knows anyone still working on Xerces. Norm is planning to write a SAX filter to implement XInclude 1.1. He believes this will lead to a way for using XInclude 1.1 with Saxon's XSLT processor and most any other Java based tool.
Received on Monday, 21 April 2014 13:20:39 UTC