- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:59:43 +0200
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- CC: liam@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On 10/10/2013 17:56, Jirka Kosek wrote: > On 10.10.2013 17:50, Daniel Dardailler wrote: >> That's not what I meant. The right forum to discuss the value of PAS >> (not wrt XMLS) is the AC forum I suppose. This document just presents >> the reasons for doing it and some criteria to apply before doing it. > I'm happy to continue discussion on AC list. But it seems that such > discussion should be initiated by people who think that submitting XML > Schema (or any other spec) to PAS is a good idea. The discussions on the AC list would be related to the PAS program in general, not to XMLS, and the current position of W3C being that it's good to transpose some of our important REC to ISO/IEC, there is no point in starting a thread with that statement. > > Jirka >
Received on Sunday, 13 October 2013 17:00:19 UTC