- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:56:48 +0200
- To: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- CC: liam@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2013 15:57:19 UTC
On 10.10.2013 17:50, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > That's not what I meant. The right forum to discuss the value of PAS > (not wrt XMLS) is the AC forum I suppose. This document just presents > the reasons for doing it and some criteria to apply before doing it. I'm happy to continue discussion on AC list. But it seems that such discussion should be initiated by people who think that submitting XML Schema (or any other spec) to PAS is a good idea. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2013 15:57:19 UTC