- From: Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 17:03:37 -0400
- To: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- CC: webreq@w3.org, core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Hi Paul, On 04/10/13 20:00, Paul Grosso wrote: > > On 2013-10-04 18:21, Jérémie Astori wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Before I can publish, could you update your document to make it >> compliant with the 2 following rules, please: >> >> It must include a link to a preliminary interoperability or >> implementation report, or a statement that no such report exists. > > I don't understand this issue. In the SOTD, there is a paragraph that > starts: > > Known implementations are documented in the XInclude Implementation > Report at http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/10/xinclude-11-impl-report/. This statement fulfills the rule indeed. Pubrules did not detect the sentence, and I missed it when reading the SOTD, I am sorry about that. >> >> It must identify any "features at risk" declared by the Working >> Group. > > There are none. > > Note, at http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfi > it says: > > In the Call for Implementations, the Working Group MAY identify > specific features of the technical report as being "features at risk." > > Note the "may". There are no features at risk, so per the > process document, the CR need not say anything about it. > Note that the potential features at risk are needed in a CR, as pubrules specifies a "must" on [1]. However, I agree with you that nothing is mentioned when there are no features at risk. Do you think you could add a short sentence saying that there are no features at risk? That would make the document even more clear as you can see on [2]. If not, the document will still be published on Tuesday though. Thanks, Jérémie [1]: http://bit.ly/GFqC4p [2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-vibration-20130723/ > So I suggest that the document is fine as is. > > paul > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jérémie >> >> >> On 04/10/13 15:47, Paul Grosso wrote: >>> >>> The XML Core WG requests publication of >>> XML Inclusions (XInclude) Version 1.1 >>> Candidate Recommendation. It should be published at >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-xinclude-11-20131008/ >>> >>> The document is currently staged at >>> http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/09/xinclude-11/ >>> The staged document is designed to be published on >>> October 8 by having the directory moved over to >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-xinclude-11-20131008/ >>> in its entirety (which we ask webreq to do since >>> we don't have permission). The document is valid >>> and satisfies all pubrules (and will have no invalid >>> links once it is in the TR location). >>> >>> XInclude 1.1 adds some upward-compatible enhancements >>> to the XInclude 1.0 Recommendation. The three key >>> enhancements can be summarized as follows: >>> >>> * added support for a fragment identifier into text/plain >>> content, >>> >>> * additional processing to allow for “annotating” the >>> post-included infoset with further information, and >>> >>> * allow implementations the flexibility to support >>> additional parse values. >>> >>> The minutes of the transition call are available at >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/10/04-xcr-minutes.html (team only). >>> >>> SCHEDULE >>> >>> We propose a publication date of 8 October 2013. >>> >>> >>> Paul Grosso and Norman Walsh, chairs of the XML Core WG. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Received on Saturday, 5 October 2013 21:03:43 UTC