- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:52:37 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5193AF45.9070501@paulgrosso.name>
Attendees --------- Norm Paul Liam Henry John Jirka [6 organizations (7 with proxies) present out of 8] Regrets ------- Daniel, proxy to the chair Absent organizations -------------------- Innovimax Red Hat (with regrets, proxy to the chair) Our next telcon is May 29. Henry gives regrets. > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > Accepted. > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > XML Activity AC Review > ---------------------- > The XML Activity AC review was open through April 26. > > We will ask Liam to report on the status. > > There were some comments about modifications to the charter. > We will hear more about that later. No progress since our last telcon. > > xmlspec.xsl and diffspec.xsl > ---------------------------- > Paul sent email about this at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Nov/0014 > > ACTION to Norm: Come up with (and implement) a plan to > reorganize xmlspec.xsl and diffspec.xsl to "do the right thing." > > > DOM4 > ---- > Henry reported that DOM4 has removed (or deprecated) access to the > XML Declaration. Our Infoset spec says that standalone, version, > and the encoding are part of the information content of an XML > document. > > Henry and Paul think the XML Core WG should send an email > to the Web Applications Working Group (public-webapps@w3.org) > to reinstate the parts of the xml decl that are in the Infoset. > > Henry drafted a potential comment at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Feb/0023 > > John filed some thoughts to the contrary at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Feb/0026 > > Henry figures we should discuss this some more. > Norm is having a hard time caring about all this. > > Henry reached out to the webapps working group at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Apr/0009 > to try to collect some more data on this issue. > > > Possible removal of XSLT support in Chrome > ------------------------------------------ > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Apr/thread.#msg16 Not much more to say on this topic. We'll see what happens about our request to add stuff about the xml-stylesheet PI to HTML5. ---- John requests that we add MicroXML to the standing agenda, and there were no objections. > 3. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite > issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > > 4. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > We have planned to issue the following spec editions referencing > LEIRIs (and any outstanding errata): > > * XML 1.0 6th Edition (John to be editor) > * XML 1.1 3rd Edition (John to be editor) > * XInclude 3rd Edition (Paul to be editor) > > but all this is on hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. > Henry has been added as an editor and there is now a new draft, > draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-00 at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-00 > We now await this going through the IETF process. > > > 5. XInclude 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > On 2012 February 14, we published > XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases > http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/ > > On 9 October 2012, we published our FPWD of XInclude 1.1 at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/WD-xinclude-11-20121009/ > > On 15 January 2013, we published our (first) Last Call of > XInclude 1.1 at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-xinclude-11-20130115/ > and Paul sent the transition announcement at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Jan/0012 > (also cc-ing the chairs mailing list). > > To date, there has been one comment posted to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-xinclude-comments/ > Norm posted announcement of the XInclude 1.1 Last Call > to the DocBook list and there have been some comments at > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook/201301/threads.html#00005 > Norm posted announcement of the XInclude 1.1 Last Call > to the xml-dev list at > http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/201302/msg00023.html > (No comments to date.) > > ACTION to Norm: Prepare a Disposition of Comments document for > XInclude 1.1. Norm has started a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/05/xinclude-11-lc-doc/ Comment #001, fragid definition for XInclude 1.1 ------------------------------------------------ We should say something about implementations *should* try to figure out fragids before just doing whatever they want with other values of the parse attribute. Another example is xincluding a graphics format that then magically becomes SVG. > > ACTION to Norm: Create an Implementation Report document for > XInclude 1.1. > > Liam reminds us we will need a test suite too. > > > paul > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013May/0001 > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 15:53:09 UTC