- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:21:27 +0200
- To: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- CC: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 15:22:02 UTC
On 13.6.2012 16:51, Paul Grosso wrote:
> Jirka's comments at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Apr/0002
> have him preferring 2c, but then he raises the following:
> Should be xml:id copied to included root element?
Yep. But I think that if we go with 2c option we can handle xml:id
uniformly with another namespaced attributes. If someone would like to
override ID but retain original one (in order to fix original local
references) he can use my:id on xi:include and then do some magic on
composed result to use "right IDs".
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 15:22:02 UTC