- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:51:15 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On 2012-06-13 08:26, Norman Walsh wrote: > As outlined in the requirements document, http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/ > there seem to be two large questions to answer wrt designing XInclude 1.1. > > 1. What attribute should hold the fragment identifier? > > a. xpointer, despite the fact that XPointer is specifically about XML > b. textpointer, as a parallel to xpointer > c. fragid, deprecating xpointer > > 2. What attributes should be copied from the XInclude element to the > root(s) of the included content? > > a. all of them > b. all except href, parse, xml:base, and xml:lang > c. only namespace qualified attributes > d. only non-namespace-qualified attributes > e. the attributes to be copied could be explicitly enumerated in a new attribute > > And there's the question of if a new attribute should be added to the included > elements that enumerates the attributes copied. > > For what it's worth, my initial inclinations are 1c and 2c. I really don't like 2e. By way of rounding up a few more comments/issues: Jirka's comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Apr/0002 have him preferring 2c, but then he raises the following: Should be xml:id copied to included root element? Daniel's comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Apr/0010 have him raising the issue about there possibly not being a root included element (if what is included is multi-rooted well balanced chunks and/or even pure text). paul
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 14:51:48 UTC