- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:04:11 +0100
- To: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Cc: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, Glenn Marcy <gmarcy@us.ibm.com>
- Message-ID: <CAAK2GfFu+u27gPAiY2e6uqtwpmgEMU=p_Z3QDdJ-4ZoH0bMQzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, Please accept my regrets, My proxy to the chair Best regards, Mohamed On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> wrote: > We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, > December 12, from > 08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka > 11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka > 16:30-17:00 UTC > 16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK > 17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe > on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. > We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . > > See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents > and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please > email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. > > Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and > completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it > at the beginning of the call. > > ************************************************************** > > Note, this telcon of December 12 will be the last telcon of the > year, as we are cancelling the telcon on December 26. After this > telcon of December 12, the next telcon will be 2013 January 9. > > ************************************************************** > > Agenda > ====== > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > New charter > ----------- > Our current charter expires in January. > > Liam has started a draft charter at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2013/xml-core-charter.html > > Paul already posted some (mostly editorial) comments at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Nov/0017 > > John sent some suggested wording about MicroXML at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Nov/0019 > > Liam implemented Paul's suggestions ($Date: 2012-11-28 03:11:12 $), > then Paul sent more email at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Nov/0023 > > During the last telcon, we had consensus agreement with Paul's latest > suggestions (which included using John's wording). Since then, there > has been some more email at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Dec/thread#msg7 > > ACTION to Liam: Make another attempt at reflecting our current > plans wrt MicroXML in the draft charter while still satisfying > whatever legalities need to be satisfied. > > > xml-stylesheet and HTML5 > ------------------------ > This was discussed at the TPAC f2f. The conclusion was > for Norm to pass on to the HTML5 WG suggested text for a > non-normative note to be included in the HTML5 1.0 spec > which he did: > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14689#c35 > > The latest draft we've seen is dated 08 November 2012 at > http://htmlwg.org/cr/html/ > and we don't see our requested wording therein. > > Norm checked with Robin who said he says there's another > draft expected that will have the note. > > ACTION to Norm: Continue to track mention of xml-stylesheet > PI in the HTML5 spec. > > Names that begin [Xx][Mm][Ll] > ----------------------------- > This was discussed at the TPAC f2f. > > Norm: proposed erratum > > s/in this or future versions of this specification/ > /in this or future specifications from the XML Core WG or its successors/ > > Henry: I'm perfectly happy to entertain a motion to remove this from > this specification and retain the "xml:" prefix only for elements and > attributes and "xml-" only for PI targets. > > Norm: I'd prefer to make explicit that you *can* write names that > begin "xml", but doing so exposes you to being walked on in the > future. So don't do that. > > Jirka: I can go either way, it's always been a restriction, users > should know better, but there are lots of documents that use it, > so we should adapt to common practice. > > Jirka sent email athttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Nov/0009 > > ACTION to Norm: Draft an erratum to "reserve" xml-* for PI targets > and delete the restriction that we lay claim to other names that > start with "xml". > > > xmlspec.xsl and diffspec.xsl > ---------------------------- > Paul sent email about this athttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Nov/0014 > > ACTION to Norm: Come up with (and implement) a plan to > reorganize xmlspec.xsl and diffspec.xsl to "do the right thing." > > > 3. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite > issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > > 4. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > We have planned to issue the following spec editions referencing > LEIRIs (and any outstanding errata): > > * XML 1.0 6th Edition (John to be editor) > * XML 1.1 3rd Edition (John to be editor) > * XInclude 3rd Edition (Paul to be editor) > > but all this is on hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. > > Henry has been added as an editor and there is now a new draft, > draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-00 athttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-00 > > We now await this going through the IETF process. > > > 5. XInclude 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > On 2012 February 14, we published > XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases > http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/ > > On 9 October 2012, we published our FPWD of XInclude 1.1 at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/WD-xinclude-11-20121009/ > > The latest draft is dated 4 December 2012 at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/08/xinclude-11/ > > Paul commented and suggested some rewording of one note at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Dec/0004 > > Norm agreed with Paul's suggested rewording and no one else commented. > If there are no objections during this week's telcon, then: > > ACTION to Norm: Implement Paul's suggestion in an updated > draft of the XInclude 1.1 spec. > > There is a publishing moratorium from December 14 through > January 2, so unless the WG feels strongly that we should > publish in the next few days, I would plan to publish the > next draft in mid January (our first telcon of the year is > January 9). Assuming that schedule, we should decide if we > should make the next draft a Last Call. > > > paul > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Nov/0025<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2012Jun/0014> > > > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 19:04:42 UTC