Re: TPAC topic: Errata in XML 1.0

"Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com> writes:
> Did we ever say or imply that the productions in the spec
> were non-ambiguous?  Is the right response to these issues
> simply that we never said the productions were non-ambiguous,
> and if a parser writer wants or needs to translate them into
> equivalent non-ambiguous versions, that's fine, but there is
> nothing wrong with the productions in the spec?

I think that's probably the right response.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 413 624 6676
www.marklogic.com