- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:54:22 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have received several potential errata against XML 1.0 5th Ed at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2011OctDec/0000 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2011OctDec/0001 Both are about "ambiguity" in the productions. Paul asks: Did we ever say or imply that the productions in the spec were non-ambiguous? Is the right response to these issues simply that we never said the productions were non-ambiguous, and if a parser writer wants or needs to translate them into equivalent non-ambiguous versions, that's fine, but there is nothing wrong with the productions in the spec?
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 16:57:46 UTC