- From: Michael Schäfer <michael.schaefer@destatis.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 12:38:37 +0200
- To: veillard@redhat.com
- CC: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Am 18.05.2011 09:51, schrieb Daniel Veillard: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:16:56AM -0400, Grosso, Paul wrote: >> I believe your summary is basically correct. >> >> Some tools (XML editors, schema editors, XSLT processors, etc.) may >> issue a warning as you suggest might be the case, but since the spec >> doesn't require it, such a warning would be optional. > > I had though about that in the context of libxml2 years ago, the > problem is that basically you need to keep a "whitelist" of allowed > "xml" names in the parser and forces the parser to be updated in some ways > when new XML specs using new "xml" based names are issued. A maintainance > nightmare so I didn't do this, even when the parser is in pedantic mode, I think this is absolutely o.k. for a parser, but I would have preferred if oXygen had warned me that I was creating a non-conforming schema (AFAIK, other schema editors didn't complain either). It would have saved me some trouble. Michael
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 10:38:57 UTC