RE: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2011 January 12 -- telcon CANCELLED

Apparently between snow/MIT IT problems, Zakim, and the fact
that our telcon is no longer on the W3C schedule, we aren't
having a telcon today.

Our next telcon is January 26th.

If either John or Mohamed wants to press for changes to our
new charter, I recommend you make specific suggestions in
email to restart the discussion before it is too late to make
any such changes.

paul 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Monday, 2011 January 10 8:40
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2011 January 12
> 
> 
> We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday,
> January 12, from
>           08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka
>           11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka
>           15:30-16:00 UTC
>           16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
>           17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
> on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
> We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .
> 
> See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
> and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
> email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
> 
> Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
> completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
> at the beginning of the call.
> 
> Regrets from Norm.
> 
> Agenda
> ======
> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>    the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>    or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
> 
> 
> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
> 
> Charter renewal
> ---------------
> We need to consider what we want for our charter for 2011
> and 2012.  Liam has drafted one at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/10/xml-core-charter.html
> 
> Mohamed has suggested that XML Performance could become in the
> scope of XML Core.  He also sent email at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Nov/0012
> and follow-up at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Dec/0001
> 
> John has requested that we add language such as "consider the
> development of a standardized subset of XML for use cases where
> full XML is inappropriate" so that we can do something like MicroXML.
> 
> [Discussion depends on the attendance of Mohamed, John, and Liam.]
> 
> 
> XPointer registry and the xpath() scheme
> ----------------------------------------
> Norm sent email requesting re-instatement of the xpath() scheme at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-
> registry/2010OctDec/
> 0002
> 
> The email list to track discussions about this registry is
> public-xpointer-registry@w3.org archived at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-registry/
> 
> Liam plans to process something here soon.
> 
> 
> XML Processor Profiles review
> -----------------------------
> We have been asked to review the XML Processing Model WG's
> Last Call Working Draft of "XML processor profiles".
> 
> Glenn wanted to see some rationale/use case for moving from
> one profile to the next.
> 
> ACTION to Glenn:  Send your request for rationales to the
> xproc comments list: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
> 
> John is happy with the document as it stands.
> 
> 
> 3.  XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
> 
> 
> 4.  XML Test Suite.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
> 
> ACTION to Henry:  Construct a test case for the XML test suite
> issues raised by Frans Englich:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/
> 
> 
> 5.  Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see
>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0
>    and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
> 
> 
> 6.  LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
> 
> 
> 7.  xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id
> 
> 
> 8.  XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
> 
> 
> 9.  XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
> 
> 
> 10.  XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
> 
> 
> 11.  Associating Stylesheets.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss
> 
> AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/
> 
> ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at
> http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata
> 
> 
> 12.  xml-model
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas
> 
> This has been published as a WG Note at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/
> 
> At
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Sep/0030
> Jirka indicated the ISO version of XML model is going to DIS.
> It should be out for vote as a DIS until the end of the year.
> 
> We will plan to update our WG Note to reference the ISO spec
> once it is officially available. We will also update our Note
> to reference the Rec version of AssocSS 2nd Ed when available.
> 
> 
> paul
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
> [3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Dec/0006
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 16:39:15 UTC