- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:04:46 +0100
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTik5VkJNc64AgQYxU0Pc6VF3UO7r7xQm1HXqFEH=@mail.gmail.com>
First, best wishes to everyone But, please accept my regrets, I have a conflicting meeting at this very same time Mohamed On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote: > > We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, > January 12, from > 08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka > 11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka > 15:30-16:00 UTC > 16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK > 17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe > on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. > We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . > > See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents > and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please > email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. > > Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and > completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it > at the beginning of the call. > > Regrets from Norm. > > Agenda > ====== > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > Charter renewal > --------------- > We need to consider what we want for our charter for 2011 > and 2012. Liam has drafted one at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/10/xml-core-charter.html > > Mohamed has suggested that XML Performance could become in the > scope of XML Core. He also sent email at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Nov/0012 > and follow-up at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Dec/0001 > > John has requested that we add language such as "consider the > development of a standardized subset of XML for use cases where > full XML is inappropriate" so that we can do something like MicroXML. > > [Discussion depends on the attendance of Mohamed, John, and Liam.] > > > XPointer registry and the xpath() scheme > ---------------------------------------- > Norm sent email requesting re-instatement of the xpath() scheme at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-registry/2010OctDec/ > 0002 > > The email list to track discussions about this registry is > public-xpointer-registry@w3.org archived at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-registry/ > > Liam plans to process something here soon. > > > XML Processor Profiles review > ----------------------------- > We have been asked to review the XML Processing Model WG's > Last Call Working Draft of "XML processor profiles". > > Glenn wanted to see some rationale/use case for moving from > one profile to the next. > > ACTION to Glenn: Send your request for rationales to the > xproc comments list: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > > John is happy with the document as it stands. > > > 3. XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata > > > 4. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite > issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > > 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 > and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. > > > 6. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > > 7. xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id > > > 8. XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base > > > 9. XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 > > > 10. XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > > 11. Associating Stylesheets. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss > > AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/ > > ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at > http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata > > > 12. xml-model > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas > > This has been published as a WG Note at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/ > > At > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Sep/0030 > Jirka indicated the ISO version of XML model is going to DIS. > It should be out for vote as a DIS until the end of the year. > > We will plan to update our WG Note to reference the ISO spec > once it is officially available. We will also update our Note > to reference the Rec version of AssocSS 2nd Ed when available. > > > paul > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Dec/0006 > > > > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 09:05:19 UTC