- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:53:34 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Just before seeing this email, I posted up a new draft at http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm See what you think of it. Process-wise, I note that the changes consist of: * two new sentences in the intro which is non-normative * extremely minor rewording in one sentence in section 3 * the stylesheet -> schema typo correction in section 3 * a reference update * a "footnote" in the table in appendix C (non-normative) so it is fair to characterize these changes as quite minimal. paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka@kosek.cz] > Sent: Wednesday, 2011 April 13 9:41 > To: John Cowan > Cc: Grosso, Paul; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: xml-model and DTDs [was: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of > 2011 April 6] > > John Cowan wrote: > > Grosso, Paul scripsit: > > > >> Sure, at one level, a PI is a PI and therefore cannot affect the > >> validity of the document which contains it. > > > > That's my only point. > > Hi Paul and John, > > I think that I understand to both direction in which you approach the > problem. However at this stage I would prefer as minimal change to spec > text as possible while addressing comments received during ISO process. > If there are some interop problem found in future we can always address > them by issuing another edition at W3C and amendment at ISO. > > > That's why I spoke of validity rather than validation. XML validity > > is a property of documents, whereas validation of XML is a much more > > flexible notion, which may or may not involve determining XML > validity. > > I can see difference, but I'm not sure that average Joe XML developer > will grasp this subtle difference. > > >> * what should it mean if the document has both a doctype declaration > >> and an xml-model that points to a DTD. > > > > It's up to the application what that means, but only the DOCTYPE > > declaration affects validity. > > I think that we can add similar phrase to one which defines relation to > xsi:schemaLocation attributes. > > "This specification does not define the interaction of xml-model > processing instructions with XML document type declaration > [http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#dt-doctype]. Applications supporting both > xml-model processing instructions and XML document type declaration may > provide means for specifying which information takes precedence." > > >> * are DTDs associated with a document via an xml-model PI used for > >> creating or augmenting an information set from a given document? > Or, > >> are such DTDs simply used for validation rather than augmentation? > > > > The application can do either validation or augmentation or both or > > neither. > > +1 > > Although we probably need to clarify this somewhere, because this is > core of JP-0001 comment: > > "If DTDs associated by the xml-model PI > contain entity declarations or > attribute default values, are they used for > creating or augmenting an > information set from a given document? Or, > are DTDs simply > used for validation rather than augmentation? > > Clearly state whether associated DTDs > contribute to information sets" > > I can answer this comment simply by saying that this is out-of-scope > for > xml-model and that this is completely implementation dependent. The > question is whether we need to add some text to spec to make this more > clear. I think that there is no need for adding some new text as from > introduction text it should be clear that this is out-of-scope. I can > also try to contact original submitter (I think that it was either > directly Murata-san or that he can point me to the right person) and > check if he would be happy with such resolution. > > Jirka > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Professional XML consulting and training services > DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member > ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 14:54:15 UTC