- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:11:26 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be 2010 December 1. Status and open actions ======================= Administrivia ------------- We need to consider what we want for our charter for 2011 and 2012. Liam has drafted one at http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/10/xml-core-charter.html It's fairly uncontroversial, but comments are solicited. TAG concern wrt 3023bis, +xml media types and fragids ----------------------------------------------------- Henry sent email about this at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0006 3023bis says that the +xml implies that the resource is suitable for processing by generic xml processors. And it says that such xml processors should handle fragment ids. Specifically, handling the fragment identifiers in an rdf+xml document is not something that a generic xml processor could do. The TAG was leaning toward removing the statement from 3023bis that says that fragid syntax and semantics is something that any generic xml processor can handle in a +xml resource. Norm and John (among others) weighed in; see the thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125 Norm's latest (as of July 18) is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jul/0020 As of 2010 November 22, the denouement from the TAG appears to be represented by email to the 3023bis editors at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Nov/0078 XPointer registry and the xpath() scheme ---------------------------------------- Norm sent email requesting re-instatement of the xpath() scheme at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-registry/2010OctDec/ 0002 Associating Stylesheets ----------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/ ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata XML Model --------- This has been published as a WG Note at http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/ At http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Sep/0030 Jirka indicated the ISO version of XML model is going to DIS. It should soon go out for vote as DIS over the next 3-4 months. We will plan to update our WG Note to reference the ISO spec once it is officially available. We will also update our Note to reference the Rec version of AssocSS 2nd Ed when available.
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 15:13:19 UTC