- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:29:15 +0300
- To: "XML CORE" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:18:49 +0300, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote: > I just noticed that we recevied another comment on the AssocSS > draft at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-stylesheet-comments/2010Mar/ > 0000 > > Daniel Glazman says: > > <quote> > I think section 4 [1], in the definition of the 'media' attribute, > should probably specify that if the 'media' pseudo-attribute is absent > then the stylesheet applies to "all" media [2]. > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/03/xml-stylesheet/#the-xml-stylesheet-process > ing-instruction > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/media.html#media-types > </quote> > > What we currently say about the media attribute is: > > <quote> > Gives the media for which the referenced style sheet applies. > If specified, documents must set the value to a string that > matches the media_query_list production of the Media Queries > specification. [MQ] > </quote> > > We also say: > > <quote> > The details of how conforming xml-stylesheet processors > exploit the information contained in xml-stylesheet > processing instructions are out of scope for this document, > as they may reasonably vary from processor to processor. > </quote> > > First, I'd suggest that we should change "xml-stylesheet > processors" in the above (which is the Note we added to > section 2 to respond to issue holman) to "application". > The xml-ss processor does not exploit the information > in the PI at all; it passes it on to the application > which decides what to do with it. > > Then, I'd respond to Daniel by saying that it is out of > scope of this spec to say how an application interprets > the information that the xml-stylesheet processor passes > to it. In fact, despite what CSS says about media types, > it may not be the case for all applications that they will > treat a PI with a missing media attribute as applicable > to them. (In particular, Arbortext ignores a PI with no > media attribute.) > > Comments? I agree with your suggestions. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Monday, 29 March 2010 14:29:42 UTC