RE: New editors' draft of AssocSS for review

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, 2010 March 10 9:41
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: New editors' draft of AssocSS for review
 
> Grosso, Paul writes:
> 
> > First change in section 2 ends with:
> >
> >  which are available for application to the containing document.
> >
> > Is there a word missing, or are you using "application" in
> > a different sense (in which case, I think we should reword).
> 
> No word missing -- how about "...are available to be applied to..." ?

That's better.

> >
> > Under "charset" the new note says "must be ignored".
> > Ignored by what?  The xml-stylesheet processor, the
> > application, something else?  I think we need to say.
> 
> Good point, let's discuss.

OK

Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 15:43:07 UTC