- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:40:56 +0000
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Grosso, Paul writes:
> First change in section 2 ends with:
>
> which are available for application to the containing document.
>
> Is there a word missing, or are you using "application" in
> a different sense (in which case, I think we should reword).
No word missing -- how about "...are available to be applied to..." ?
> -----
>
> Second change in section 2 using the phrase "conformant
> xsl-stylesheet processors" whereas the preceding sentence
> uses "conforming xsl-stylesheet processors". I see no
> reason for the gratuitous difference. We should also
> scan the rest of the document for "conformant" and change
> it to "conforming" unless there is a good reason not to.
Good point. That was the only one, and I've changed it.
>
> Under "charset" the new note says "must be ignored".
> Ignored by what? The xml-stylesheet processor, the
> application, something else? I think we need to say.
Good point, let's discuss.
> Appendix B, first bullet:
>
> s/by/but/
Done.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFLl72IkjnJixAXWBoRAlUtAJ4vHKSdtuiHqrHK6PCoygxd7nFTpACeK2xy
s+uDGtHdvAXIwi+6mI+30SU=
=dVZb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 15:41:25 UTC