- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:49:22 +0100
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- CC: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 8 March 2010 14:49:58 UTC
Grosso, Paul wrote: > I'm not entirely sure why, but I know we had a discussion about it, > so I'm wondering why we would think allowing "extension" > pseudo-attributes > is bad in the case of xml-stylesheet and good in the case of xml-model. The reason is that the current xml-model proposal contains schema specific pseudo-attribute "phase" to accommodate some Schematron use-cases. In the future new schema languages can emerge and it is possible that they also will need some new specific pseudo-attributes. The xml-model should be prepared for such situation. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 8 March 2010 14:49:58 UTC