- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:18:24 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> 2. Additional pseudo-attributes should be allowed because in future we > can add new schema-specific pseudo-attributes like phase > see comments from MSMQ or > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2010JanMar/0000.html For what it's worth, in our AssocSS draft, we say: Documents must not specify other pseudo-attributes on xml-stylesheet processing instructions. That is, we decided against allowing "extension" pseudo-attributes in the xml-stylesheet case. I'm not entirely sure why, but I know we had a discussion about it, so I'm wondering why we would think allowing "extension" pseudo-attributes is bad in the case of xml-stylesheet and good in the case of xml-model. paul
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 22:21:29 UTC