- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:36:00 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: <cowan@ccil.org>
Attendees --------- Norm Paul Henry Liam off at xx:20 John Daniel [6 organizations (6 with proxies) present out of 10] Regrets ------- Glenn Mohamed Simon Absent organizations -------------------- Innovimax (with regrets) IBM (with regrets) Opera (with regrets) Jirka Kosek Next meeting: July 14. Regrets from Liam, DV > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). Accepted. > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > TPAC Nov 1-5 in Lyons, France > ----------------------------- > Paul indicated that XML Core tentatively plans to have a f2f > at TPAC, and we are currently scheduled for Monday/Tuesday > 1-2 November 2010. > > Likely: Henry, Mohamed, Liam, Daniel > Unlikely: Glenn, Paul, Simon, Norm, John > > Registration is now open; see http://www.w3.org/2010/11/TPAC/ > > TAG concern wrt 3023bis, +xml media types and fragids > ----------------------------------------------------- > Henry sent email about this at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0006 > > 3023bis says that the +xml implies that the resource is suitable for > processing by generic xml processors. And it says that such xml > processors should handle fragment ids. Specifically, handling the > fragment identifiers in an rdf+xml document is not something that a > generic xml processor could do. > > The TAG was leaning toward removing the statement from 3023bis that > says that fragid syntax and semantics is something that any generic > xml processor can handle in a +xml resource. Noah sent email and > Norm has replied. See the thread at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125 > > Somewhat related, Henry sent email about XML fragid interpretation at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0025 > Norm and John prefer to allow RDF (and others) to be an exception, but the rule is that the default treatment is as specified in XPointer Framework. ACTION to John: Weigh in on the www-tag discussion; see the thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125 > > 3. XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata > > > 4. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite > issues raised by Frans Englich: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > > 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 > and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. > > > 6. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Mar/0045 > from Dan Connolly which references > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Mar/0037 > > At (among other places) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010May/0001 > Larry Masinter explains the plan, to wit: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-1.3 > contains a definition in section 1.3 on "LEIRI proessing" which > should in fact be a definition of LEIRI: > > LEIRI: This term was used in various XML specifications to > refer to strings that, although not valid IRIs, were > acceptable input to the processing rules in Section 7.1. > > where Section 7.1 of the same document is intended to contain an > algorithm that will convert an LEIRI to an IRI. > > If that's adequate for XML Core to change its reference for LEIRI, > fine, and if you need more, please say so. > > A direct reference to Section 7.1 is > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-7.1 > > ACTION to Henry, Mohamed: Review the definition and discussion > of LEIRIs in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00 > and let the WG know if this would allow us to replace our LEIRI > Note with a reference to this spec. > ACTION to Henry, Mohamed, John: Review the definition and discussion of LEIRIs in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00 and let the WG know if this would allow us to replace our LEIRI Note with a reference to this spec. > > 7. xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id > > > 8. XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base > > > 9. XLink 1.1. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 > > The XLink 1.1 Rec was published at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xlink11-20100506/ > > > 10. XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > > 11. Associating Stylesheets. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss > > Our latest public draft is at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/04/xml-stylesheet/ > > The transition request for AssocSS is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0034 > > We had an unsuccessful transition call last week. See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0057 > > The editors drafted new wording for Section 2 Conformance; see > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/ > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/diff.html > > Paul sent email to Daniel Glazman and TimBL requesting comment at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010May/0012 > and there has been no response. > > ACTION to Liam (as staff contact): Push this latest draft at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/ > to PER per the transition request at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0034 > with appropriately adjusted dates (which the editors and staff > contacts should determine). > Liam will try to talk to TimBL tomorrow and, in any case, he will push things forward to PER. ACTION to Liam: Send email to the list with updated dates for AssocSS PER. ACTION to Henry: Regenerate a new AssocSS PER with updated dates. ACTION to Liam: Get AssocSS published as a PER. > > 12. xml-model > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas > > This has been published as a WG Note at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/ > > > paul > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010May/0002 >
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 15:40:57 UTC