- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:02:33 +0200
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: "public-xml-core-wg@w3.org" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Please accept my late regrets Regards Mohamed On Wednesday, July 28, 2010, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote: > Reminder: Starting with today's telcon, the XML Core WG's > telcon will start 30 minutes later than we have previously. > > Corrected times are shown below. > > paul > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul >> Sent: Monday, 2010 July 26 10:34 >> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org >> Subject: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2010 July 28 >> >> >> We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, >> July 28, from >> 08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka >> 11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka >> 15:30-16:00 UTC >> 16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK >> 17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe >> on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. >> We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . >> >> See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents >> and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please >> email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. >> >> Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and >> completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it >> at the beginning of the call. >> >> >> Regrets from Henry--proxy to Norm. >> >> >> Agenda >> ====== >> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and >> the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, >> or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). >> >> >> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. >> >> TPAC Nov 1-5 in Lyons, France >> ----------------------------- >> Paul indicated that XML Core tentatively plans to have a f2f >> at TPAC, and we are currently scheduled for Monday/Tuesday >> 1-2 November 2010. >> >> Likely: Henry, Mohamed, Liam, Daniel >> Unlikely: Glenn, Paul, Simon, Norm, John >> >> Registration is now open; see http://www.w3.org/2010/11/TPAC/ >> >> TAG concern wrt 3023bis, +xml media types and fragids >> ----------------------------------------------------- >> Henry sent email about this at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0006 >> >> 3023bis says that the +xml implies that the resource is suitable for >> processing by generic xml processors. And it says that such xml >> processors should handle fragment ids. Specifically, handling the >> fragment identifiers in an rdf+xml document is not something that a >> generic xml processor could do. >> >> The TAG was leaning toward removing the statement from 3023bis that >> says that fragid syntax and semantics is something that any generic >> xml processor can handle in a +xml resource. Noah sent email and >> Norm has replied. See the thread at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125 >> >> Somewhat related, Henry sent email about XML fragid interpretation at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0025 >> >> Norm and John prefer to allow RDF (and others) to be an exception, >> but the rule is that the default treatment is as specified in >> XPointer Framework. >> >> Norm and John (among others) weighed in; see the thread at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125 >> and >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jul/thread.html#msg0 >> >> Norm's latest (as of July 26, posted July 14) is at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jul/0020 >> >> >> 3. XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata >> >> >> 4. XML Test Suite. >> >> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite >> >> ACTION to Henry: Construct a test case for the XML test suite >> issues raised by Frans Englich: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ >> >> >> 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see >> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 >> and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. >> >> >> 6. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri >> >> See >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Mar/0045 >> from Dan Connolly which references >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Mar/0037 >> >> At (among other places) >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010May/0001 >> Larry Masinter explains the plan, to wit: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-1.3 >> contains a definition in section 1.3 on "LEIRI proessing" which >> should in fact be a definition of LEIRI: >> >> LEIRI: This term was used in various XML specifications to >> refer to strings that, although not valid IRIs, were >> acceptable input to the processing rules in Section 7.1. >> >> where Section 7.1 of the same document is intended to contain an >> algorithm that will convert an LEIRI to an IRI. >> >> If that's adequate for XML Core to change its reference for LEIRI, >> fine, and if you need more, please say so. >> >> A direct reference to Section 7.1 is >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-7.1 >> >> Paul sent email to that effect to the TAG at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jul/0027 >> and >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jul/0024 >> >> This should close this issue (until 3987bis is an RFC). >> >> >> 7. xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id >> >> >> 8. XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base >> >> >> 9. XLink 1.1. >> >> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 >> >> The XLink 1.1 Rec was published at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xlink11-20100506/ >> >> >> 10. XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude >> >> >> 11. Associating Stylesheets. >> >> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss >> >> Our latest public draft is at >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/04/xml-stylesheet/ >> >> The transition request for AssocSS is at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0034 >> >> We had an unsuccessful transition call last week. See >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0057 >> >> The editors drafted new wording for Section 2 Conformance; see >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/ >> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/diff.html >> >> Paul sent email to Daniel Glazman and TimBL requesting comment at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010May/0012 >> and there has been no response. >> >> Liam talked to TimBL July 1 and sent some sketchy email at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jul/0002 >> explaining what we should do next. >> >> At our telcon last week, Paul took an action to suggest some >> change to our latest AssocSS draft, but at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jul/0028 >> he threw in the towel suggesting that we just re-request >> that we take the latest AssocSS draft to PER. >> >> >> 12. xml-model >> >> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas >> >> This has been published as a WG Note at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/ >> >> >> paul >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core >> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks >> [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jul/0025 >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 15:03:02 UTC