- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:45:03 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be 2010 September 8. Status and open actions ======================= TAG concern wrt 3023bis, +xml media types and fragids ----------------------------------------------------- Henry sent email about this at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0006 3023bis says that the +xml implies that the resource is suitable for processing by generic xml processors. And it says that such xml processors should handle fragment ids. Specifically, handling the fragment identifiers in an rdf+xml document is not something that a generic xml processor could do. The TAG was leaning toward removing the statement from 3023bis that says that fragid syntax and semantics is something that any generic xml processor can handle in a +xml resource. Norm and John (among others) weighed in; see the thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125 Norm's latest (as of July 18) is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jul/0020 Per Noah's email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Aug/0003 there will be no new status until September. Shortname referencing XLink versus XLink 1.1 -------------------------------------------- Mohamed asked if xlink should point to xlink11; see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Aug/0003 We asked Ian about our options, and he pointed us to http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/ as an example of the kind of thing we could add to XLink 1.0. Several WG members expressed support for doing something like that. We should make a decision on our next telcon. Associating Stylesheets ----------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss We are working toward a PER for AssocSS 2nd Edition. Our latest public draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/04/xml-stylesheet/ The first transition request for AssocSS is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0034 We had an unsuccessful transition call. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0057 The editors drafted new wording for Section 2 Conformance; see http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/ http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/diff.html DanielG expressed acceptance of that draft at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Aug/0002 The WG decided in an email vote at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Aug/thread#ms g30 to request transition to PER. Paul sent out a draft transition request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Aug/0041 that awaits actions by Henry to move forward. ACTION to Henry: Prepare the PER-ready document directory. ACTION to Henry: Update the DoC with DanielG's acceptance. ACTION to Paul (once things are ready): Send in the AssocSS PER Transition Request. ACTION to Liam (once Paul sends the trans req): Do whatever is necessary to get AssocSS out as PER. XML Model --------- XML Model is being balloted by SC34 until the ? of August. In the middle of September SC34 will have a face-to-face meeting where they will discuss comments received during the ballot. Jirka will bring SC34 comments, concerns, and proposed resolutions back to XML Core WG in the second half of September.
Received on Monday, 30 August 2010 13:46:00 UTC