- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:42:31 -0400
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul > Sent: Monday, 2010 August 09 9:00 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2010 August 11 > TAG concern wrt 3023bis, +xml media types and fragids > ----------------------------------------------------- > Henry sent email about this at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0006 > > 3023bis says that the +xml implies that the resource is suitable for > processing by generic xml processors. And it says that such xml > processors should handle fragment ids. Specifically, handling the > fragment identifiers in an rdf+xml document is not something that a > generic xml processor could do. > > The TAG was leaning toward removing the statement from 3023bis that > says that fragid syntax and semantics is something that any generic > xml processor can handle in a +xml resource. Noah sent email and > Norm has replied. See the thread at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125 > > Somewhat related, Henry sent email about XML fragid interpretation at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0025 > > Norm and John prefer to allow RDF (and others) to be an exception, > but the rule is that the default treatment is as specified in > XPointer Framework. > > Norm and John (among others) weighed in; see the thread at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125 > and > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jul/thread.html#msg0 > > Norm's latest (as of July 26, posted July 14) is at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jul/0020 > > We've seen no progress on this since July 14. > > We'll ask Henry for a TAG status on this on August 11. Henry is off the hook--Noah just sent email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Aug/0003 saying: we will take up consideration of the concerns in the fall, after more of our members return from their summer breaks. paul
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 21:43:08 UTC