- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:19:41 -0400
- To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, <timbl@w3.org>, <ralph@w3.org>, <liam@w3.org>, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, <w3t-comm@w3.org>, <chairs@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org] > Sent: Friday, 2010 April 16 9:36 > To: Grosso, Paul > Cc: Daniel Glazman; timbl@w3.org; ralph@w3.org; liam@w3.org; Ian > Jacobs; w3t-comm@w3.org; chairs@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: Transition Request: PER Request for Associating Style > Sheets with XML documents 1.0 (Second Edition) > > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 09:49 -0400, Grosso, Paul wrote: > > Daniel is correct that his comments (and objections) are not > > yet reflected in the DoC referenced by my Transition Request email. > > > > Daniel's comments came in a bit later than others, and there > > remains an outstanding action item for that DoC to be updated > > accordingly, and I hadn't realized that action wasn't yet > > completed when I sent in the transisition request. > > > > I will push to get that action completed as soon as possible. > > And the new DoC will reflect the objection from Daniel? Yes. paul
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 15:20:17 UTC