RE: Transition Request: PER Request for Associating Style Sheets with XML documents 1.0 (Second Edition) from Philippe Le Hegaret on 2010-04-16 (public-xml-core-wg@w3.org from April 2010)

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:36:03 -0400
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, timbl@w3.org, ralph@w3.org, liam@w3.org, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, w3t-comm@w3.org, chairs@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1271428563.32620.31.camel@chacal>

On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 09:49 -0400, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> Daniel is correct that his comments (and objections) are not
> yet reflected in the DoC referenced by my Transition Request email.
> 
> Daniel's comments came in a bit later than others, and there 
> remains an outstanding action item for that DoC to be updated
> accordingly, and I hadn't realized that action wasn't yet
> completed when I sent in the transisition request.
> 
> I will push to get that action completed as soon as possible.

And the new DoC will reflect the objection from Daniel?

Philippe

Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 14:36:12 UTC