W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2010

RE: Comments on xml-model

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:23:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30212F0B724@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Friday, 2010 April 09 7:51
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Comments on xml-model
> I think I've worked out how group is used, but I think the explanation
> is too brief. At the very least the double-negative in point one, "do
> not have a specified group with a non-empty value" requires really
> careful thought.

I don't know enough about this to try to reword things,
so I'm not going to try on my own.

I'm going to send in the transition request now, but 
if Jirka (or anybody else) wants to suggest some new
wording, I'll stick that in.

Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 14:27:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:40:40 UTC