RE: Draft #1: Transition Request: First Public Working Group Note for Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0

I have updated the paragraph in the SotD accordingly.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka@kosek.cz]
> Sent: Thursday, 2010 April 08 2:33
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: liam@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Draft #1: Transition Request: First Public Working Group
> Note for Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
> 
> Grosso, Paul wrote:
> 
> >  However, this specification is expected to be used as
> >  the basis for similar standards or specifications by
> >  the W3C other standards bodies, so the basic content
> >  of this WG Note may be--or may become--referenceable
> >  in another form.
> >
> > So we have the unique paragraph.  Let me know if anyone
> > objects to that paragraph.
> 
> Wouldn't it be better then to be absolutely clear about the joint work
> and use instead something like:
> 
> "However, this specification is jointly developed by W3C and ISO/IEC
> JTC1/SC34. The technical content of this specification and ISO/IEC
> 19757-11 is expected to be identical. So the basic content
> of this WG Note may be--or may become--referenceable
> in another form."
> 
> Actually I was thinking about proposing something like this once we
> proceed more in ISO process. But we can add this right now. I plan to
> add inverse sentence to ISO draft, so everyone in ISO will see that
the
> text is based on W3C WG Note and this in result will allow SC34 to ask
> ITTF (ISO body responsible for final publication) for making the final
> international standard publicly available for download.

Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 14:27:09 UTC