Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-03

On Thursday, September 24, 2009, 6:58:46 PM, Paul wrote:

GP> Glad to see some progress on 3023-bis.

GP> The reference to XML Base should reflect the January 2009 2nd Edition
GP> (in terms of authors and date--the undated link itself is fine).

Thanks for catching that, Paul.

GP> Likewise, the reference to XML 1.1 should reflect the August 2006 
GP> 2nd Edition.

Will fix also. Hopefully that won't be a -04 internet draft, but it will go in the resulting RFC.

GP> I don't know why XPointerXmlns is in the normative references.
GP> The only reference is from appendix B (which is not normative)
GP> wherein it says:

GP>  XPointer ([XPointerFramework] and [XPointerElement] and [XPointerXmlns])
GP>  has been added as fragment identifier syntax ...

GP> but in fact [XPointerXmlns] has not been added (and I don't think
GP> it should be).  So I think you should delete the mention of
GP> [XPointerXmlns] from that note in appendix B and delete it from
GP> the list of normative references.

Again, thanks for catching that. Will fix for the next revision.

GP> paul

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lilley
>> Sent: Thursday, 2009 September 24 11:29
>> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-murata-kohn-
>> lilley-xml-03

>> Hello public-xml-core-wg,

>> An HTML version of the draft may be seen at
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-
>> 03.html

>> This draft incorporates the TAG finding

>> Bray, T., Ed., “Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use,”
>> April 2004.


>> which also brings advice on the use of the charset parameter into line
>> with current practice. In brief, the charset parameter should only be
>> added if it agrees with the xml encoding declaration. In the absence of
>> an explicit charset parameter, the encoding specified by the xml
>> encoding declaration is used. (This is a change from RFC 3023, which
>> required enforcing us-ascii in that case).

>> The only difference between todays draft-03 and the draft-02 of 31 July
>> this year is that draft-03 clarifies that the specification applies to
>> all editions of XML 1.0 (first to fifth edition) and XML 1.1. The
>> syntax of the xml encoding declaration is the same (bar minor
>> clarifications) in all editions. Thanks to Henry Thompson for help with
>> that.

>> Once promoted to an RFC, this specification will obsolete RFC 3023.

>> --
>>  Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
>>  Technical Director, Interaction Domain
>>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead
>>  Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG






-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG

Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 18:21:35 UTC