RE: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-03

Glad to see some progress on 3023-bis.

The reference to XML Base should reflect the January 2009 2nd Edition
(in terms of authors and date--the undated link itself is fine).

Likewise, the reference to XML 1.1 should reflect the August 2006 
2nd Edition.

I don't know why XPointerXmlns is in the normative references.
The only reference is from appendix B (which is not normative)
wherein it says:

 XPointer ([XPointerFramework] and [XPointerElement] and [XPointerXmlns])
 has been added as fragment identifier syntax ...

but in fact [XPointerXmlns] has not been added (and I don't think
it should be).  So I think you should delete the mention of
[XPointerXmlns] from that note in appendix B and delete it from
the list of normative references.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lilley
> Sent: Thursday, 2009 September 24 11:29
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-murata-kohn-
> lilley-xml-03
> 
> Hello public-xml-core-wg,
> 
> An HTML version of the draft may be seen at
> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-

> 03.html
> 
> This draft incorporates the TAG finding
> 
> Bray, T., Ed., “Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use,”
> April 2004.
> 
> 
> which also brings advice on the use of the charset parameter into line
> with current practice. In brief, the charset parameter should only be
> added if it agrees with the xml encoding declaration. In the absence of
> an explicit charset parameter, the encoding specified by the xml
> encoding declaration is used. (This is a change from RFC 3023, which
> required enforcing us-ascii in that case).
> 
> The only difference between todays draft-03 and the draft-02 of 31 July
> this year is that draft-03 clarifies that the specification applies to
> all editions of XML 1.0 (first to fifth edition) and XML 1.1. The
> syntax of the xml encoding declaration is the same (bar minor
> clarifications) in all editions. Thanks to Henry Thompson for help with
> that.
> 
> Once promoted to an RFC, this specification will obsolete RFC 3023.
> 
> --
>  Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
>  Technical Director, Interaction Domain
>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead
>  Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
>

Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 16:59:49 UTC