- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:05:23 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be November 18. Status and open actions ======================= SC 34/WG 1 use of xml-model PI ------------------------------ We had responded to an SC 34/WG1 request to be able to use xml-model for a PI target. Our response is at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0011 We received a response at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Oct/0001 to which Paul replied at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Oct/0021 But then Mohamed, as liaison, reported that there would be problems with JTC1 writing the spec and then having W3C publish it. One solution would be for us to write the spec (WG Note or Rec?) and then ISO would reference it. ACTION to Henry: Investigate the possibilities of having XML Core WG write an xml-model spec. Paul sent email to SC34 rescinding our agreement to let them use xml-model until we can figure out how to go about it: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Oct/0039 3023-bis -------- A new draft of 3023-bis was at http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-04.ht ml I gather this was discussed at TPAC, and a new proposed draft is at http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/latest.html ACTION to Henry: Provide notes or at least some summary of whatever discussion occurred at TPAC. Paul sent comments on this latest draft at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Nov/0054 XHTML character entity support ------------------------------ Starting at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Nov/0000 there was quite a thread that I can't really follow. Can someone summarize what the issue might be for XML Core and suggest what kind of response, if any, we should make? Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 ------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. The NS 1.0 2nd Ed Errata document is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/xml-names-errata The NS PE doc is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html NS 1.0 3rd Ed PER is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PER-xml-names-20090806/ and the review was generally successful. We had a few comments that we addressed; the DoC is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/10/disposition.html and the Rec-ready document is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-3e.html The WG approved publication as a Rec. ACTION to Henry: Submit a transition/publication request for NS 1.0 3rd Ed to go to Rec. There seems to be an outstanding issue at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2009Oct/0004 ACTION to Henry: Suggest how we might handle the NS 1.0 3rd Ed push back from Bjoern Hoehrmann. xml:id ------ The xml:id Recommendation is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xml-id-20050909/ The Errata document is at http://www.w3.org/2005/09/xml-id-errata John Cowan submitted a proposed erratum at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jan/0009 At one point we thought we had Consensus: The sentence "A document that uses xml:id attributes that have a declared type other than xs:ID will always generate xml:id errors" in Appendix D.3 should be deleted. But they we reconsidered. Henry sent further email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0048 We did agree that applying xml:id processing does not have any impact on the DTD/XSD validity of the document. John re-summarized his thoughts at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0008 ACTION to Henry (and others): Continue the xml:id issue discussion in email. --- Richard pointed out the following note in XML Base (just before section 3.1): This specification does not give the xml:base attribute any special status as far as XML validity is concerned. In a valid document the attribute must be declared in the DTD, and similar considerations apply to other schema languages. and suggested a similar note should go into xml:id in D.1. XLink 1.1 --------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 The XLink 1.1 Last Call has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. Norm has prepared an updated DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ Paul summarized the open issues at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0045 Norm replied at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0009 ACTION to Norm: Update the DoC accordingly. The latest editor's draft (of the PR) is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ and a diff-with-the-last-CR draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview-diff.html Henry finds the DTD/RelaxNG/XSD fragments throughout the spec unhelpful and would like to remove them (leaving them only in the appendices). Henry specifically referenced the example immediately preceding 5.3. But this was in the CR, so we will probably leave it, but we will remove the default for xlink:type. Henry has updated the DTDs and sent things to Norm. ACTION to Norm: Update the draft with the correct DTD, XSD, and RNC. We plan to skip CR and going directly to PR. Paul drafted a PR transition request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Mar/0013 Norm created an updated IR at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ir.html ACTION to Norm: Adding a mention of the test suite at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/03/xlink11-tests to the IR. ACTION to Norm: Create a diff between 1.0 and the 1.1 PR ready draft. XInclude 3rd Edition PER ------------------------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude XInclude 2nd Edition is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. Associating Stylesheets ----------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss Associating stylesheets with XML version 1.0 is at: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/ The Errata document is at: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata The latest issues document with CONSENSUS resoltions is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/06/assocss-issues.htm The penultimate editor's draft of AssocSS 1.0 2nd Edition is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/09/xml-stylesheet.html We had some discussion at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Sep/thread.ht ml#msg24 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Oct/thread.ht ml#msg14 Simon produced another draft at: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/09/xml-stylesheet.html ACTION to Paul and others: Review and comment on the latest Associating stylesheets draft at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/09/xml-stylesheet.html
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 21:06:55 UTC