- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:43:58 -0500
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Simon Pieters scripsit:
> Sorry to chime in this late, but I don't understand why we don't just fix
> the text/xml encoding problem by saying that it's equivalent to
> application/xml instead of keeping a requirement that all implementors
> will continue to ignore?
Since it's an IETF RFC, there's nothing the WG can do. As an individual,
you could create a draft replacement RFC making this change.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Would your name perchance be surname Puppet, given name Sock?
--Rick Moen
Received on Saturday, 7 November 2009 03:44:28 UTC