- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:23:10 +0100
- To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:20:08 +0100, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > Hello public-xml-core-wg, > > Following our productive meeting yesterday, I have edited in the changes > we agreed and the result is available at > > http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/latest.html Sorry to chime in this late, but I don't understand why we don't just fix the text/xml encoding problem by saying that it's equivalent to application/xml instead of keeping a requirement that all implementors will continue to ignore? (Implementors ignore it because there is a non-trivial legacy (mostly feeds) with charsetless text/xml content that uses non-us-ascii characters and specify the encoding with the XML declaration or expect the default to be UTF-8.) -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 23:23:46 UTC