- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:02:10 +0200
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0907230502j7e71abefi49543849c01005b8@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mohamed writes: > > > Probably this part should be updated > > [[ > > > D Changes since version 1.0 (Non-Normative) > > > This version incorporates the errata as of 1 June 2006[1.0 Errata]. > > > ]] > > Oops, missed that -- thanks, I've updated this -- please review in > versions now available: > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-3e.html > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-3e-diff.html > > > Probably the Non Normative reference to errata should be updated too > > Right. Looks fine ! > > > > Since we're at working on Namespace, I tought that it was proposed > > to describe all specification that makes use of reserved XML trigram > > in PI or elsewhere to be described here. Is it still the case ? > > Not sure I understand what you're suggesting. . . Well, pointing to xml-stylesheet, xml:id, xml:base etc. Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 12:02:50 UTC