Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mohamed writes:

> Probably this part should be updated
> [[

> D Changes since version 1.0 (Non-Normative)

> This version incorporates the errata as of 1 June 2006[1.0 Errata].

> ]]

Oops, missed that -- thanks, I've updated this -- please review in
versions now available:

  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-3e.html
  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/04/xml-names-2e/xml-names-10-3e-diff.html

> Probably the Non Normative reference to errata should be updated too

Right.

> Since we're at working on Namespace, I tought that it was proposed
> to describe all specification that makes use of reserved XML trigram
> in PI or elsewhere to be described here. Is it still the case ?

Not sure I understand what you're suggesting. . .

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKaD4rkjnJixAXWBoRAqmGAKCBIUHoDkedhpoj0CsuR+IdcVFb5ACdGCTJ
9CvIJQ9Xd/TvwUrG/Qr2QWQ=
=+eEF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 10:41:22 UTC