- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:05:41 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, February 11, from 08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka 11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka 16:00-17:00 UTC 16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK 17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 . See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it at the beginning of the call. ****************************************************** Our last quorate meeting was in mid December. Please try to make this telcon if at all possible. ****************************************************** Agenda ====== 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. The next Technical Plenary (and AC meeting) week (TPAC week) will be Nov 2-6 in Santa Clara, California: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html#Future The XML CG has asked if the XML Core WG would be planning to meet f2f during that week. 3. XML 1.0 See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata The XML 1.0 5th Edition Recommendation is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126/ 4. XML Test Suite. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite ACTION to Richard: Construct a test case for the XML test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ 5. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. The NS 1.0 2nd Ed Errata document is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/xml-names-errata The NS PE doc is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html Richard added some discussion at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html#npe29 The WG agreed with his direction and asked that he go forward with it. ACTION to Richard: Fill in a proposed resolution for NPE29. 6. LEIRIs See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri The WG Note defining LEIRIs is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-leiri-20081103/ The following specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs: XML 1.0 6th Edition XML 1.1 3rd Edition XML Base 2nd Edition XLink 1.1 (First Edition) XInclude 3rd Edition 7. xml:id The xml:id Recommendation is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xml-id-20050909/ John Cowan submitted a proposed erratum at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jan/0009 8. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base The XML Base 2nd Edition Recommendation is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-xmlbase-20090128/ 9. XLink 1.1. See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 The earlier XLink CR was published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ The XLink 1.1 LC was published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. Norm has prepared a DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ ACTION to Norm: Update XLink 1.1 to refer to the LEIRI note. There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD should default the xlink:type attribute value. None of this effects our last call because the XSD/DTD are not normative. John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for each of our conformance levels. The notion was to have a schema for people who want to implement the basic level of conformance, so they only have simple links. For the DTD, which is just a sample, we just need a smaller subset. Likewise, the XSD should include only declarations for the simple links. ACTION to Henry, John: Think about having a basic level conformance XSD for XLink. Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR. ACTION to Henry: Review the history and make a recommendation as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR. 10. XInclude 3rd Edition See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude XInclude 2nd Edition is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition. ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Dec/0005
Received on Monday, 9 February 2009 15:07:15 UTC